Wartości ukryte w metaforach
PDF (English)

Słowa kluczowe

język przenośny
metafory
wartości
standaryzacja
język estoński

Jak cytować

Vainik, E., & Paulsen, G. (2023). Wartości ukryte w metaforach: Mowa przenośna w dyskursie dotyczącym „kryzysu języka”. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium, 8(1), 22–51. https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium.2023.8.1.249

Abstrakt

Niniejszy artykuł prezentuje oparte na wartościach badanie figur stylistycznych określających język i jego standaryzację. Materiał zaczerpnęliśmy z debaty dotyczącej modernizacji norm językowych, która miała miejsce w estońskich mediach publicznych w latach 2020-2022 i osiągnęła punkt, który można nazwać kryzysowym. Debata odbywała się głównie w formie tekstów opiniotwórczych, wyrażających subiektywną perspektywę autorów. W jej trakcie uwidoczniły się dwa przeciwstawne poglądy na kwestie języka i planowania językowego, reprezentujące liberalny i konserwatywny model wartości. Niniejsze badanie koncentruje się na wzajemnym oddziaływaniu wartości i wzorców myślenia figuratywnego, ponieważ metafory były szeroko stosowane w celu wzmocnienia argumentów obu stron. Oparte na założeniach teoretyczno-metodologicznych teorii metafory konceptualnej, ram figuratywnych, analizy scenariuszy metaforycznych, systemowej lingwistyki funkcjonalnej i krytycznej analizy dyskursu badanie ujawniło, że przeciwne strony sporu faworyzowały określone metafory podczas dyskusji o języku. Jako kwestię poboczną poruszamy również dynamikę stosunków politycznych, która uwidacznia się poprzez dyskurs dotyczący kryzysu językowego.

https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium.2023.8.1.249
PDF (English)

Bibliografia

Biri, Ylva (2018) “Addressing and Acknowledging Readers and Writers. Exploring Metadiscourse in Opinion Writing Online.” Journal Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 3(1); 153–177. https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium2018.3.1.Biri.

Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn, Gerard J. Steen (2016) “Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony.” Communication Theory, 26(4); 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096.

Citron, Francesca M. M., Adele E. Goldberg (2014) “Metaphorical Sentences are More Emotionally Engaging than Their Literal Counterparts.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11); 2585–2595. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00654.

Cresswell, Julia (2021) Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acref/9780198868750.001.0001.

Eesti õigekeelsussõnaraamat 2018 [Dictionary of Standard Estonian 2018, ÕS] (2018) Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.

EKI ühendsõnastik 2023 [EKI Combined Dictionary 2023, CombiDic] (2023) Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut, Sõnaveeb. Available at https://sonaveeb.ee/.

Fairclough, Norman (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368.

Gantar, Polona, Iztok Kosem, Simon Krek (2016) “Discovering Automated Lexicography: The Case of the Slovene Lexical Database.” International Journal of Lexicography, 29(2); 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecw014.

Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

Halliday, Michael A. K. (2003) “Introduction: On the “Architecture” of Human Language.” [In:] Jonathan Webster (ed.), On Language and Linguistics. Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. III. London; New York: Continuum; 1–29.

Halpern, Tess (2018) Using Genre Theory to Understand the Way Opinion Journalism is Changing in Today’s Digital World. University of Massachusetts. https://www.umass.edu/ english/sites/default/files/assets/english/research-on-opinion-writing-halpern.pdf.

Hancı-Azizoglu, Eda B. (2022) “Emotional Intelligence and Empathic Linguistic Power in Times of Crisis.” [In:] Eda B. Hancı-Azizoglu and Maha Alawdat (eds.), Research Anthology on Applied Linguistics and Language Practices, Pennsylvania: IGI GLOBAL; 100–115.

Haugen, Einar (1972) “The Ecology of Language.” [In:] Einar Haugen (ed.), The Ecology of Language. Essays by Einar Haugen (Selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 325–339. [Reprinted version of Haugen (1971).]

Hermann, Charles F. (1963) “Some Consequences of Crisis which Limit the Viability of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 8; 61–82.

Huang, Mimi (2020) “Introduction: Constructing and Communicating Crisis Discourse from Cognitive, Discursive and Sociocultural Perspectives.” [In:] Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen (eds.), The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, Frames and Discourses. (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society, and Culture; vol. 87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1–20.

Johnson, Mark (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kallas, Jelena, Svetla Koeva, Margit Langemets, Carole Tiberius, Iztok Kosem (2019) “Lexicographic Practices in Europe: Results of the ELEXIS Survey on User Needs.” [In:] Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the eLex 2019 Conference, 1–3 October 2019, Sintra, Portugal. Lexical Computing; 519–536.

Kivle, Benedicte M.T., Gry Espedal (2022) “Identifying Values Through Discourse Analysis.” [In:] Gry Espedal, Beate Jelstad Løvaas, Stephen Sirris and Arild Wæraas (eds.), Researching Values. Methodological Approaches for Understanding Values Work in Organisations and Leadership. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_10.

Koreinik, Kadri (submitted) “Extra-Linguistic Arguments in the XXI Century Language Planning Discourse: “Superdictionary” between Language Standardization from Above and Below.. Extra-Linguistic Arguments and Superdictionary.”

Khorob, Solomiia (2019) “Opinion Journalism: The Genre of Literature or Journalism?” Precarpathian Bulletin of the Shevchenko Scientific Society Word, 2(54); 364–370. https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7402-2019-2(54)-364-370.

Klaas-Lang, Birute (2022) “Meie ühiskonda ähvardab lõhestada keelekriis” [Our Society Is Threatened by the Language Crisis]. Online portal of Estonian Public Broadcasting ERR, 19.10.2022. https://www.err.ee/1608756460/birute-klaas-lang-meie-uhiskonda-ahvardab-lohestada-ka-keelekriis

Kluckhohn, Clyde (1951) “Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification.” [In:] Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 388–433.

Kövecses, Zoltán (2016) “Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” [In:] Elena Semino and Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Oxford: Routledge; 13–27.

Kövecses, Zoltán (2018) “Metaphor in Media Language and Cognition: A Perspective from Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Lege artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, III(1); 124–141. DOI: 10.2478/lart2018-0004 ISSN 2453-8035.

Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. The Essential Guide for Progressives. Vermont: White River Junction, Chelsea Green Publishing.

Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, George, Mark Turner (1989) More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langemets, Margit, Peeter Päll (2021) “Muutuv ÕS” [The changing Dictionary of Standard Estonian ÕS]. Sirp 4, 14, 29.01.2021. https://www.sirp.ee/s1-artiklid/varamu/muutuv-os/ (23.10.2023).

Langer, Nils, Agnete Nesse (2012) “Linguistic Purism.” [In:] Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 607–625.

Love, Nigel (2017) “On Languaging and Languages.” Language Sciences, 61; 113–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.001.

Maffi, Luisa (2005) “Linguistic, Cultural, and Biodiversity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1), 599–617.

Musolff, Andreas (2016) Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Pajunen, Henni (2023) “Kielen ammattilaiset oikeinkirjoitusnormin muutosta vastaan.” [The Language Experts against Change of an Orthographic Norm]. Kielikello 1. https://www.kielikello.fi/-/kielen-ammattilaiset-oikeinkirjoitusnormin-muutosta-vastaan.

Price, Haze, Dan McIntyre (2023) “Public Linguistics.” [In:] Hazel Price and Dan McIntyre (eds.), Communicating Linguistics Language, Community and Public Engagement. New York: Routledge; 3–15.

Selznick, Philip (1992) The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Sopory, Pradeep, James Price Dillard (2002) “The Persuasive Effects of Metaphor: A Meta‐Analysis.” Human Communication Research, 28(3); 382–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x.

Sperber, Dan (2000) “Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective.” [In:] Dan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 117–137.

Språkporten. Access to English: Social Studies. Available at (23.10.2023): https://access-socialstudies2018.cappelendamm.no/ento/tekst.html?tid=2324193&sek=2261800

Steen, Gerard (2008) “The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor.” Metaphor & Symbol 23 (4); 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802 426753.

Steen, Gerard (2017) “Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Main Tenets, Urgent Issues.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1); 1–24, DOI 10.1515/ip-2017-0001.

Sundelius, Bengt, Eric Stern, Fredrick Bynander (1997) Krishantering på Svenska [Crisis Management Swedish Style]. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus.

Sweetser, Eve. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tavast, Arvi, Kristina Koppel, Margit Langemets, Jelena Kallas (2020) “Towards the Superdictionary: Layers, Tools and Unidirectional Meaning Relations.” [In:] Zoe Gavriilidou, Maria Mitsiaki and Asimakis Fliatouras (eds.), Proceedings of XIX EURALEX Congress: Lexicography for Inclusion, Vol. I. Alexandroupolis: Democritus University of Thrace; 215−223.

Thomas, George (1991). Linguistic Purism. London: Longman.

Ulmer, Robert R., Timothy L. Sellnow, Matthew W. Seeger (2015) Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisis to Opportunity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Vainik, Ene, Geda Paulsen (2023) “Kujundlik mõtlemine 2020–2022 keelekriisis” [Figurative Thought during the 2020–2022 Language Crisis]. Keel ja Kirjandus, 66(7); 651–677. https://doi.org/10.54013/kk787a1.

Van Dijk, Teun A. (2018) “Critical Discourse Analysis.” [In:] Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics.), 2nd edition; Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118584194.ch22.

White, Peter R. R. (2008) “Praising and Blaming, Applauding and Disparaging – Solidarity, Audience Positioning, and the Linguistics of Evaluative Disposition”. [In:] Gerd Antos and Eija Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 542–567.

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.