Słowa kluczowe
metafory
wartości
standaryzacja
język estoński
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Niniejszy artykuł prezentuje oparte na wartościach badanie figur stylistycznych określających język i jego standaryzację. Materiał zaczerpnęliśmy z debaty dotyczącej modernizacji norm językowych, która miała miejsce w estońskich mediach publicznych w latach 2020-2022 i osiągnęła punkt, który można nazwać kryzysowym. Debata odbywała się głównie w formie tekstów opiniotwórczych, wyrażających subiektywną perspektywę autorów. W jej trakcie uwidoczniły się dwa przeciwstawne poglądy na kwestie języka i planowania językowego, reprezentujące liberalny i konserwatywny model wartości. Niniejsze badanie koncentruje się na wzajemnym oddziaływaniu wartości i wzorców myślenia figuratywnego, ponieważ metafory były szeroko stosowane w celu wzmocnienia argumentów obu stron. Oparte na założeniach teoretyczno-metodologicznych teorii metafory konceptualnej, ram figuratywnych, analizy scenariuszy metaforycznych, systemowej lingwistyki funkcjonalnej i krytycznej analizy dyskursu badanie ujawniło, że przeciwne strony sporu faworyzowały określone metafory podczas dyskusji o języku. Jako kwestię poboczną poruszamy również dynamikę stosunków politycznych, która uwidacznia się poprzez dyskurs dotyczący kryzysu językowego.
Bibliografia
Biri, Ylva (2018) “Addressing and Acknowledging Readers and Writers. Exploring Metadiscourse in Opinion Writing Online.” Journal Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 3(1); 153–177. https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium2018.3.1.Biri.
Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn, Gerard J. Steen (2016) “Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony.” Communication Theory, 26(4); 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096.
Citron, Francesca M. M., Adele E. Goldberg (2014) “Metaphorical Sentences are More Emotionally Engaging than Their Literal Counterparts.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11); 2585–2595. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00654.
Cresswell, Julia (2021) Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acref/9780198868750.001.0001.
Eesti õigekeelsussõnaraamat 2018 [Dictionary of Standard Estonian 2018, ÕS] (2018) Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
EKI ühendsõnastik 2023 [EKI Combined Dictionary 2023, CombiDic] (2023) Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut, Sõnaveeb. Available at https://sonaveeb.ee/.
Fairclough, Norman (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368.
Gantar, Polona, Iztok Kosem, Simon Krek (2016) “Discovering Automated Lexicography: The Case of the Slovene Lexical Database.” International Journal of Lexicography, 29(2); 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecw014.
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K. (2003) “Introduction: On the “Architecture” of Human Language.” [In:] Jonathan Webster (ed.), On Language and Linguistics. Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. III. London; New York: Continuum; 1–29.
Halpern, Tess (2018) Using Genre Theory to Understand the Way Opinion Journalism is Changing in Today’s Digital World. University of Massachusetts. https://www.umass.edu/ english/sites/default/files/assets/english/research-on-opinion-writing-halpern.pdf.
Hancı-Azizoglu, Eda B. (2022) “Emotional Intelligence and Empathic Linguistic Power in Times of Crisis.” [In:] Eda B. Hancı-Azizoglu and Maha Alawdat (eds.), Research Anthology on Applied Linguistics and Language Practices, Pennsylvania: IGI GLOBAL; 100–115.
Haugen, Einar (1972) “The Ecology of Language.” [In:] Einar Haugen (ed.), The Ecology of Language. Essays by Einar Haugen (Selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 325–339. [Reprinted version of Haugen (1971).]
Hermann, Charles F. (1963) “Some Consequences of Crisis which Limit the Viability of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 8; 61–82.
Huang, Mimi (2020) “Introduction: Constructing and Communicating Crisis Discourse from Cognitive, Discursive and Sociocultural Perspectives.” [In:] Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen (eds.), The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, Frames and Discourses. (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society, and Culture; vol. 87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1–20.
Johnson, Mark (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kallas, Jelena, Svetla Koeva, Margit Langemets, Carole Tiberius, Iztok Kosem (2019) “Lexicographic Practices in Europe: Results of the ELEXIS Survey on User Needs.” [In:] Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the eLex 2019 Conference, 1–3 October 2019, Sintra, Portugal. Lexical Computing; 519–536.
Kivle, Benedicte M.T., Gry Espedal (2022) “Identifying Values Through Discourse Analysis.” [In:] Gry Espedal, Beate Jelstad Løvaas, Stephen Sirris and Arild Wæraas (eds.), Researching Values. Methodological Approaches for Understanding Values Work in Organisations and Leadership. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_10.
Koreinik, Kadri (submitted) “Extra-Linguistic Arguments in the XXI Century Language Planning Discourse: “Superdictionary” between Language Standardization from Above and Below.. Extra-Linguistic Arguments and Superdictionary.”
Khorob, Solomiia (2019) “Opinion Journalism: The Genre of Literature or Journalism?” Precarpathian Bulletin of the Shevchenko Scientific Society Word, 2(54); 364–370. https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7402-2019-2(54)-364-370.
Klaas-Lang, Birute (2022) “Meie ühiskonda ähvardab lõhestada keelekriis” [Our Society Is Threatened by the Language Crisis]. Online portal of Estonian Public Broadcasting ERR, 19.10.2022. https://www.err.ee/1608756460/birute-klaas-lang-meie-uhiskonda-ahvardab-lohestada-ka-keelekriis
Kluckhohn, Clyde (1951) “Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification.” [In:] Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 388–433.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2016) “Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” [In:] Elena Semino and Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Oxford: Routledge; 13–27.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2018) “Metaphor in Media Language and Cognition: A Perspective from Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Lege artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, III(1); 124–141. DOI: 10.2478/lart2018-0004 ISSN 2453-8035.
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. The Essential Guide for Progressives. Vermont: White River Junction, Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George, Mark Turner (1989) More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langemets, Margit, Peeter Päll (2021) “Muutuv ÕS” [The changing Dictionary of Standard Estonian ÕS]. Sirp 4, 14, 29.01.2021. https://www.sirp.ee/s1-artiklid/varamu/muutuv-os/ (23.10.2023).
Langer, Nils, Agnete Nesse (2012) “Linguistic Purism.” [In:] Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 607–625.
Love, Nigel (2017) “On Languaging and Languages.” Language Sciences, 61; 113–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.001.
Maffi, Luisa (2005) “Linguistic, Cultural, and Biodiversity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1), 599–617.
Musolff, Andreas (2016) Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Pajunen, Henni (2023) “Kielen ammattilaiset oikeinkirjoitusnormin muutosta vastaan.” [The Language Experts against Change of an Orthographic Norm]. Kielikello 1. https://www.kielikello.fi/-/kielen-ammattilaiset-oikeinkirjoitusnormin-muutosta-vastaan.
Price, Haze, Dan McIntyre (2023) “Public Linguistics.” [In:] Hazel Price and Dan McIntyre (eds.), Communicating Linguistics Language, Community and Public Engagement. New York: Routledge; 3–15.
Selznick, Philip (1992) The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sopory, Pradeep, James Price Dillard (2002) “The Persuasive Effects of Metaphor: A Meta‐Analysis.” Human Communication Research, 28(3); 382–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x.
Sperber, Dan (2000) “Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective.” [In:] Dan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 117–137.
Språkporten. Access to English: Social Studies. Available at (23.10.2023): https://access-socialstudies2018.cappelendamm.no/ento/tekst.html?tid=2324193&sek=2261800
Steen, Gerard (2008) “The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor.” Metaphor & Symbol 23 (4); 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802 426753.
Steen, Gerard (2017) “Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Main Tenets, Urgent Issues.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1); 1–24, DOI 10.1515/ip-2017-0001.
Sundelius, Bengt, Eric Stern, Fredrick Bynander (1997) Krishantering på Svenska [Crisis Management Swedish Style]. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus.
Sweetser, Eve. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tavast, Arvi, Kristina Koppel, Margit Langemets, Jelena Kallas (2020) “Towards the Superdictionary: Layers, Tools and Unidirectional Meaning Relations.” [In:] Zoe Gavriilidou, Maria Mitsiaki and Asimakis Fliatouras (eds.), Proceedings of XIX EURALEX Congress: Lexicography for Inclusion, Vol. I. Alexandroupolis: Democritus University of Thrace; 215−223.
Thomas, George (1991). Linguistic Purism. London: Longman.
Ulmer, Robert R., Timothy L. Sellnow, Matthew W. Seeger (2015) Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisis to Opportunity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vainik, Ene, Geda Paulsen (2023) “Kujundlik mõtlemine 2020–2022 keelekriisis” [Figurative Thought during the 2020–2022 Language Crisis]. Keel ja Kirjandus, 66(7); 651–677. https://doi.org/10.54013/kk787a1.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2018) “Critical Discourse Analysis.” [In:] Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics.), 2nd edition; Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118584194.ch22.
White, Peter R. R. (2008) “Praising and Blaming, Applauding and Disparaging – Solidarity, Audience Positioning, and the Linguistics of Evaluative Disposition”. [In:] Gerd Antos and Eija Ventola (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 542–567.
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium