Faces of Contemporary Cognitivism
PDF (English)

Jak cytować

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2017). Faces of Contemporary Cognitivism. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium, 1(1/2). https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium2016.1.2.Lewandowska

Abstrakt

The paper focuses on a comparison of the concepts of language and language studies as presented in contemporary cognitivism and expounded by Ronald Langacker, George Lakoff and Charles Fillmore in their versions of Cognitive Grammar on the one hand and by Noam Chomsky in his Minimalism Program on the other. The theoretical concepts and hypotheses that are discussed relate to the concept of modelling and the locus of linguistic meaning, place of intentionality in the philosophy of language and linguistic theory, the nature of language and cognitive abilities as well as the proper theme of linguistic inquiry. The status of public (shared) language and the position of meaning and semantic theories in linguistic description are dealt with in the next part. Problems evolving from those diverse views on language such as verifiability on the one hand and the methodological constraint on the other conclude the discussion. Referred to are also the generative as opposed to cognitive models of language acquisition and, consequently, diverse methodologies as used by scholars of these persuasions. Conclusions show those aspects of Chomsky’s generativism and Cognitive Linguistics that seem incompatible and those that can be perceived as converging.

Keywords: cognitive linguistics, generative linguistics, language acquisition, meaning representation .

https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium2016.1.2.Lewandowska
PDF (English)

Bibliografia

Bowerman, Melissa (1996) “The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants”. [In:] John J. Gumperz, Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 145–176.

Brugman, Claudia ([1981] 1988) The story of ‘over’: Polysemy, semantics and the structure of the lexicon. New York, London: Garland Press.

Chomsky, Noam (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam (1980) Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam (1986) Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.

Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam (2000) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Internet cogling discussion lists.

Davidson, Donald (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dennet, Denis (1988) “Quining Qualia”. [In:] Anthony J. Marcel, Edoardo Bisiach (eds.) Consciousness in Contemporary Science Oxford: Clarendon Press; 42–47.

Egan, Frances (2003) “Naturalistic inquiry: Where does mental representation fit in?”. [In:] Louise M. Antony and Norbert Horstein (eds.) Chomsky and His

Critics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 89–104.

Fillmore, Charles J. (1977) '”Scenes-and-frames Semantics.” [In:] Antonio Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic Structures Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland; 55–81.

Fillmore, Charles J. (1982). “Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis'”. [In:] Robert J. Jarvella, Wolfgang Klein (eds), Speech, Place and Action. London: John Wiley; 31–59.

Fodor, Jerry A. (1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Geeraerts, Dirk (1995) “Representational formats in cognitive semantics.” Folia Linguistica XXIX/1–2; 21–41.

Goldberg, Adele E. (1995) A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Hacken, Pius Ten (2002) “Chomskyan linguistics and the sciences of communication.” Studies in Communication Sciences 2/2; 109–134.

Harris, Zellig S. (1957) “Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure.” Language 3(3); 283–340.

Hockett, Charles F. (1954) “Two models of grammatical description.” Word 10; 210–231.

Hornstein, Norbert and David Lightfoot (1991). “Introduction”. [In:] Norbert Hornstein, David Lightfoot (eds.). Explanations in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London and New York: Longman.

Hutton, Christopher (1993). “Analysis and notation: the case for a non-realist linguistics.” [In:] Horace Romano Harré, Roy Harris (eds), Linguistics and Philosophy. Oxford: Pergamon Press; (Language and Communication Library, Volume 13); 165–178.

Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Koerner, Ernst Frideryk Konrad (E. F. K.) (2004) “Linguistics and revolution with particular reference to the ‘Chomskyan revolution’”. [In:] Frank Brisard, Sigurd D’Hondt, Tanja Mortelemans (eds) Language and Revolution – Language and Time. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics no 106. Antwerp: University of Antwerp; 3–62.

Labov, William (1973) “The boundaries of words and their meanings”. [In:] Charles-James N.Bailey, Roger Shuy (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 340–373.

Lakoff, George (1972) “Linguistics and natural logic.” [In:] Donald Davidson, Gilbert Harman (eds), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel. 545–665.

Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, Ronald, W. (1982) “Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive.” Language 58: 22–80.

Langacker, Ronald, W. (1987, 1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. vols. 1 and 2, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald, W. (2000a) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, Ronald, W. (2000b) “A dynamic usage-based model”. [In:] Michael Barlow, Suzanne Kemmer (eds), Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications; 1–63.

Langacker, Ronald, W. (2003) The First 40 Years. [Lecture given to celebrate the award of the degree Doctor Honoris Causa of the University of Łódź on 1st October, 2003].

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (1998) “Semantic representation in Cognitive Grammar.” [In:] Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), Lexical Semantics, Cognition and Philosophy. Łódź: Łódź University Press; 65–79.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (1999). “A cognitive-interactional models of cross-linguistic analysis: New perspectives on ‘tertium comparationis’ and the concept of equivalence”. In: Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.) Cognitive Perspectives on Language. Frankfurt a. Main: Peter Lang; 53-76.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (2002a) “Polysemy: research methodology and mechanisms.” [In:] Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Kamila Turewicz (eds), Cognitive Linguistics Today. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; 81–96.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (2002b) “Cognitive grammar, language acquisition, and foreign language teaching.” [In:] Janusz Arabski (ed.) Time for Words. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; 45–60.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (2005). “Schematicity and representation in language.” [In:] Kamila Ciepiela (ed.) Cognition in Language. Procesy poznawcze i język. Piotrków Trybunalski: Naukowe Wydawnictwo Piotrkowskie przy Filii Akademii Świętokrzyskiej.

Montague, Richard (1979) Formal Philosophy. [Introduction and editing: Richmond H. Thomason]. New Haven: Yale University Press.

O’Grady, William (2001) “A linguistic approach to the study of language acquisition” Journal of the Pan–Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 5, 57-71.

O’Grady, William (2003) “The radical middle nativism without Universal Grammar”. [In:] Catherine J. Doughty, Michael H. Long (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Blackwell. 43-62.

Palmer, Stephen (1978). "Fundamental aspects of representation". In Rosch, Eleanor and Barbara L. Lloyd (eds.) Computing and Categorization, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum; 259-303.

Rosch, Eleanor (1973) “Natural categories.” Cognitive Psychology 4; 328–350.

Searle, John (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. A Bradford Book, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Seuren, Pieter A. M. (2004) “How the cognitive revolution passed linguistics by.”[In:] Frank Brisard, Sigurd D’Hondt, Tanja Mortelemans (eds), Language and Revolution. Language and Time. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics no 106. Antwerp: University of Antwerp; 63–77.

Spencer-Smith, Richard (1995) “Reductionism and emergent properties.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1995, Vol. 95, Part 2; 113–129.

Talmy, Leonard (1985) “'Force dynamics in language and thought.” [In:] William E. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber, Karen L. Peterson (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society; 293–337.

Tarski, Alfred ([1944] 1956) Logic, Semantics, Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wierzbicka, Anna (1972) Semantic Primitives [Linguistische Forschungen 22]. Frankfurt: Athenäum.

Wierzbicka, Anna (1985) Conceptual Analysis and Lexicography. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.

Licencja Uznanie Autorstwa- Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych (CC BY-NC-ND). Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie do swoich publikacji.

Pobrania

Brak dostęþnych danych do wyświetlenia.