Słowa kluczowe
neologizmy
złożenia
recenzje muzyczne
gatunki cyfrowe
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
Język XXI wieku obejmuje szeroką gamę tekstów, z których wiele można znaleźć w Internecie. Podczas gdy język internetowych blogów, postów i memów spotkał się z dużym zainteresowaniem badaczy, język internetowych recenzji muzycznych pozostaje jednym z najmniej zbadanych gatunków internetowych. Jedną ze stron internetowych oferujących leksykalnie kreatywne treści jest Pitchfork. Autorzy recenzji są kreatywni pod względem tworzenia neologizmów z łącznikami, np. all-proceeds-to-charity wine, the last-real-gangsta-standing i smartphone-sucking lives. Celem tego badania jest analiza złożeń z łącznikami (neologizmów i okazjonalizmów) w recenzjach muzycznych Pitchfork pod kątem ich znaczenia, struktury i funkcji. Analiza obejmuje neologizmy uzyskane z korpusu recenzji muzycznych stworzonego na potrzeby badania. Analiza ilościowa obejmuje wszystkie złożenia w recenzjach, podczas gdy analiza jakościowa jest stosowana do złożeń neologistycznych. Pod względem struktury, w korpusie najczęściej występują złóżenia dwuelementowe. Pod względem składniowym, najczęściej używane są przymiotniki złożone, w drugiej kolejności rzeczowniki złożone, a najrzadziej w korpusie występują czasowniki i przysłówki złożone. Złożenia neologistyczne są wykorzystywane do celów ludycznej gry słownej, a także do osiągnięcia humoru i ironii. Najważniejszymi cechami złożeń neologicznych są wysoka zależność od kontekstu, nieprzewidywalność i odniesienia do popkultury.
Bibliografia
Bagasheva, Alexandra, Christo Stamenov (2013) “The Ludic Aspect of Lexical Inventiveness.” Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis lingüístics, 18; 71–82. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfilologia.18.3281
Bauer, Laurie (1983) English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, Laurie (1988) Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bauer, Laurie (2017) Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber, Ingo Plag (2013) The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benczes, Réka (2005) “Creative Noun-Noun Compounds.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3; 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.13ben
Benczes, Réka (2010) “Setting Limits on Creativity on the Production and Use of Metaphorical and Metonymical Compounds.” [In:] Alexander Onysko, Sascha Michel (eds.) Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 217–242.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey N. Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan (2021) Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bisetto, Antonietta, Sergio Scalise (2005) “The Classification of Compounds.” Lingue e linguaggio IV (2); 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1418/20728
Cambridge Dictionary. “Accident waiting to happen.” Retrieved from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/accident-waiting-to-happen#google_vignette. (Accessed 14 December 2023).
Carter, Ronald (2011) “Epilogue: Creativity: Postscripts and Prospects.” [In:] Joe Swan, Rob Pope, Ronald Carter (eds.) Creativity in Language and Literature: The State of the Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 334–349.
Cetnarowska, Bożena (2019) Compound Nouns and Phrasal Nouns in English and Polish. Katowice: Wydawnictwo UŚ.
Chik, Sonya, Maite Taboada (2020) “Generic Structure and Rhetorical Relations of Online Book Reviews in English, Japanese and Chinese.” Contrastive Pragmatics, 1 (2); 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10008
Crystal, David (2019) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dal Georgette, Fiammetta Namer (2018) “Playful Nonce-Formations, Creativity and Productivity.” [In:] Sabine Arndt-Lappe, Angelika Braun, Claudine Moulin, Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.) Expanding the Lexicon. Linguistic Innovation, Morphological Productivity, and Ludicity. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 203–228.
Daly, Rhian (2023) “Lana Del Rey – ‘Did you know that there’s a tunnel under Ocean Blvd’ review: masterful, still.” NME. Retrieved from https://www.nme.com/reviews/lana-del-rey-did-you-know-that-theres-a-tunnel-under-ocean-blvd-review-3415497. (Accessed: 10 December 2023).
Davies, Mark (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/. (Accessed 18 December 2023).
Davis, Jenny L., Nathan Jurgenson (2014) “Context Collapse: Theorizing Context Collusions and Collisions.” Information, Communication & Society, 17 (4); 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458
De Jong, Ilona K. E., Christian Burgers (2013) “Do Consumer Critics Write Differently from Professional Critics? A Genre Analysis of Online Film Reviews.” Discourse, Context and Media, 2; 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.03.001
Dudenredaktion (2017) Die deutsche Rechtschreibung (27th ed.). Berlin: Dudenverlag.
Fabb, Nigel (1998) “Compounding.” [In:] Andrew Spencer, Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell; 66–83.
Guevara, Emiliano, Sergio Scalise (2009) “Searching for Universals in Compounding.” [In:] Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni, Antonietta Bisetto (eds.) Universals of Language Today, Berlin: Springer; 101–128.
Guz, Wojciech (2012) “Are Nonce Words Really Deviant, Context-Dependent, and Unlexicalizable?” [In:] Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela, Bogdan Szymanek (eds.) Sound, Structure and Sense: Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussman, Lublin: Wydawnietwo KUL; 223–238.
Haspelmath, Martin (2002) Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.
Hickey, Raymond (2006) “Productive Lexical Processes in Present-Day English.” [In:] Christian Mair, Reinhard Heuberger (eds.) Corpora and the History of English: Papers Dedicated to Manfred Markus on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Heidelberg: Winter; 153–68.
Hohenhaus, Peter (1996) Ad-hoc Wortbildung. Terminologie, Typologie and Theorie kreativer Wortbildung im Englischen. Frankfurt/M., Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Wien: Peter Lang.
Hohenhaus, Peter (2005) “Lexicalization and Institutionalization.” [In:] Pavol Štekauer, Rochelle Lieber (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hohenhaus, Peter (2007) “How To Do (Even More) Things with nonce Words (Other Than Naming).” [In:] Judith Munat (Ed.) Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts (pp. 15-38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.58.08hoh
Huber, Elisabeth (2023) Tri-Constituent Compounds: A Usage-Based Account of Complex Nominal Compounding. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey Pullum (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jovanovic, Vladimir (2005) “Morphological Aspects of English Adjectival Compounds: Corpus Analysis.” Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 3 (2); 209–226.
Kathpalia, Sujata S. (2021) Persuasive Genres: Old and New Media. London: Routledge.
Konieczna, Ewa (2012) “Morphological Productivity and Creativity in a Politically Correct Language: A Case Study of Lexical Innovation.” Bulletin of the Transylvania University of Braşov, 5 (54) (2); 9–16.
Marchand, Hans (1969) The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation: A Synchronic-diachronic Approach. München: C.H. Beck.
Marle, Jaap van (1985) On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Matthews, Peter Hugoe (1991) Morphology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mattiello, Elisa (2016) “Analogical Neologisms in English.” Italian Journal of Linguistics, 28 (2); 103–142.
Meibauer, Jörg (2007) “How Marginal are Phrasal Compounds? Generalized Insertion, Expressivity and I/Q-Interaction.” Morphology 17; 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-008-9118-1
Miller, D. Gary (2014) English Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Missud, Jean (2018) “On the Margins of Standard Compounding: The Phrasal Compound Adjective Playing with the Norms.” e-Rea, 15 (2). https://journals.openedition.org/erea/6393
Munat, Judith (2015) “Lexical Creativity.” [In:] Rodney H. Jones (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Creativity. Routledge; 92–104.
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen, María-José Luzón (2022) Genre Networks. New York: Routledge.
Pitchfork. Retrieved from: https://pitchfork.com/. (Accessed 14 December 2023).
Plag, Ingo (2003) Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke (2008) “Word Creation: Definition–Function–Typology.” [In:] Franz Rainer, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.) Variation and Change in Morphology (pp. 201–16). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ryker, Karolina (2024) “Overcoming Challenges Posed by Intertextuality: Translation Strategies Employed in Polish and German Translations of Agatha Christie’s Novel Titles.” Forum for Contemporary Issues in Language and Literature, 5. https://doi.org/10.34739/fci.2024.05.08
Scalise Sergio, Irene Vogel (eds.) (2010) Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Scalise, Sergio, Antonietta Bisetto (2009) “Classification of Compounds.” [In:] Rochelle Lieber, Pavol Štekauer (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 49–82.
Scaruffi, Piero (2023) “Lana del Rey.” Scaruffi. Retrieved from: https://www.scaruffi.com/vol8/delrey.html. (Accessed 10 December 2023).
Schmid, Hans-Jörg (2008) “New Words in the Mind: Concept-Formation and Entrenchment of Neologisms.” Anglia, 126 (1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2008.002
Schröder, Anne, Susanne Mühleisen (2010) “New Ways of Investigating Morphological Productivity.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 35(1); 43–59.
Shaw, Philip (2009) “The Lexis and Grammar of Explicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews, 1913 and 1993.” [In:] Ken Hyland, Giuliana Diani (eds.) Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Similarweb. Retrieved from https://www.similarweb.com/. (Accessed February 14, 2024).
Spencer, Andrew (2019) “The Nature of Productivity (Including Word Formation Versus Creative Coining).” [In:] Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Retrieved from: https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-587. (Accessed 12 December 2023).
Štekauer, Pavol (1998) An Onomasiological Theory of English Word Formation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Štekauer, Pavol (2002) “On the Theory of Neologisms and Nonce-Formations.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1); 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600120122571
Štekauer, Pavol (2005) “Onomasiological Approach to Word-Formation.” [In:] Pavol Štekauer, Rochelle Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer; 207–232.
Štekauer, Pavol, Rochelle Lieber (eds.) (2005) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer.
The Free Dictionary. “The last man standing.” Retrieved from: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/last+man+standing%2C+the. (Accessed 14 December 2023).
Veale, Tony (2007) “Dynamic Creation of Analogically Motivated Terms and Categories in Lexical Ontologies.” [In:] Judith Munat (ed.) Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 189–212.
Walker, Katherine (2024) Interpreting Music, Engaging Culture: An Introduction to Music Criticism (1st ed). New York: Routledge.
Your Dictionary. “Soul-sucking.” Retrieved from: https://www.yourdictionary.com/soul-sucking. (Accessed 14 December 2023).
Zawada, Britta (2006) “Linguistic Creativity from a Cognitive Perspective.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 24 (2); 235–54. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610609486419
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium