Słowa kluczowe
ChatGPT
umiejętność pisania
obserwacje studentów
proces pisania
Jak cytować
Abstrakt
W artykule zebraliśmy obserwacje studentów uczelni na temat wykorzystania ChatGPT do pisania akademickiego w języku angielskim. Uczestnicy badania (n = 79) to studenci obowiązkowych lektoratów języka angielskiego w centrum językowym uniwersytetu w Finlandii, głównie studenci pierwszego roku studiów licencjackich reprezentujący róże programy studiów na różnych wydziałach. Wnioski uczestników zostały zebrane za pomocą ankiety, która została przeprowadzona w kilku grupach podczas semestru jesiennego 2023 roku. W ankiecie zebraliśmy dane ilościowe i jakościowe, które zostały przeanalizowane i omówione w kontekście rozwijania umiejętności pisania akademickiego w języku angielskim. Niniejsze badanie rzuciło pewne światło na konkretne sposoby wykorzystania narzędzia opartego na sztucznej inteligencji przez studentów oraz ich obserwacje dotyczące jego wpływu nie tylko na proces i produkt pisania, ale także na ich własne umiejętności pisania. Wyniki wskazują, że studenci postrzegali ChatGPT jako narzędzie o ponadprzeciętnej użyteczności, co potwierdzają wolne odpowiedzi studentów dotyczące sposobów, w jakie wykorzystywali tę technologię. Z kolei powody, przy pomocy których niektórzy studenci uzasadniali, dlaczego nie korzystają z niego, obejmowały między innymi brak potrzeby, obawy etyczne i wątpliwości, co do jego przydatności. Biorąc pod uwagę ciągły rozwój i dostępność dużych modeli językowych, takich jak ChatGPT, takie badania mają wyraźne implikacje dla wszystkich interesariuszy w szkolnictwie wyższym. Pokazując, w jaki sposób studenci wykorzystują ChatGPT w swoim pisaniu akademickim, badanie dostarcza nauczycielom prowadzącym lektoraty na poziomie uniwersyteckim wskazówek, jak cele, treść i oceny wyników kursów mogą nadal pozostać odzwierciedleniem wiedzy studentów i ich sposobów uczenia się.
Bibliografia
Adıgüzel, Tufan, Mehmet H. Kaya, Fatih K. Cansu (2023) “Revolutionizing Education with AI: Exploring the Transformative Potential of ChatGPT.” Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3); ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
Aguayo, Natividad, Cristina M. Ramírez (2020) “Does Technical Assessment Matter? Functionality and Usability Testing of Websites for ESL/EFL Autonomous Learners”. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2353
Ali, Jamal K. M., Muayad A. A. Shamsan, Taha Ahmed Hezam, Ahmed A. Q. Mohammed (2023) “Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation: Teachers and Students' Voices”. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1); 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
An, Xin, Ching S. Chai, Yushun Li, Ying Zhou, Bingyu Yang (2023) “Modeling Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Language Learning”. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2246519
Ananda, Mirza, Rahmatun Nisa, Siti Safura (2021) “Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of Grammarly in Checking Grammar in Assignments”. ACCENTIA: Journal of English Language and Education, 1(2); 72–77. https://doi.org/10.37598/accentia.v1i2.1144
Baidoo-Anu, David, Leticia O. Ansah (2023) “Education In The Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning”. Journal of AI, 7(1); 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Barrot, Jessie S. (2023) “Using ChatGPT for Second Language Writing: Pitfalls and Potentials”. Assessing Writing, 57; 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Baskara, Risang (2023) “Exploring the Implications of ChatGPT for Language Learning in Higher Education”. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2); 343–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i2.1387
Bin-Nashwan, Saeed A., Mouad Sadallah, Mohamed Bouteraa (2023) “Use of ChatGPT in Academia: Academic Integrity Hangs in the Balance”. Technology in Society, 75; 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
Brooke, John (1996) SUS: “A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale”. [In:] Patrick. W. Jordan (ed.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor & Francis; 189–194.
Cai, Qianqin, Yupeng Lin, Zhonggen Yu (2023) “Factors Influencing Learner Attitudes Towards ChatGPT-Assisted Language Learning in Higher Education”. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725
Dai, Wei, Jionghao Lin, Hua Jin, Tongguang Li, Yi S. Tsai, Dragan Gašević, Guanliang Chen (2023, July) “Can Large Language Models Provide Feedback to Students? A Case Study on ChatGPT”. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). IEEE; 323–325
Farhi, Faycal, Riadh Jeljeli, Ibtehal Aburezeq, Fawzi .F Dweikat, Samer A. Al-shami, Radouane Slamene (2023) “Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage”. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
Farrokhnia, Mohammadreza, Seyyed K. Banihashem, Omid Noroozi, Arjen Wals (2023) “A SWOT Analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for Educational Practice and Research”. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Hägglund, Maria, Isabella Scandurra (2021) “User Evaluation of the Swedish Patient Accessible Electronic Health Record: System Usability Scale”. JMIR Human Factors, 8(3); e24927–e24927. https://doi.org/10.2196/24927
Hess, Aaron S., John R. Hess (2017). “Understanding Tests of the Association of Categorical Variables: the Pearson Chi‐square Test and Fisher’s Exact Test”. Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 57(4); 877–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14057
Huallpa, Jorge J., Javier P. Flores Arocutipa, Walker D. Panduro, Luis C. Huete, Fernando A. Flores Limo, Edward E. Herrera, Rafael A. Alba Callacna, Victor A. Ariza Flores, Miguel Á. Medina Romero, Isaac M. Quispe, Fredy A. Hernández Hernández (2023) “Exploring the Ethical Considerations of Using Chat GPT in University Education”. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 11(4); 105–115. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770
Imran, Muhammad, Norah Almusharraf (2023) “Analyzing the Role of ChatGPT as a Writing Assistant at Higher Education Level: A Systematic Review of the Literature”. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4); ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
Kasneci, Enkelejda, Kathrin Seßler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, Georg Groh, Stephan Günnemann, Eyke Hüllermeier, Stephan Krusche, Gitta Kutyniok, Tilman Michaeli, Claudia Nerdel, Jürgen Pfeffer, Oleksandra Poquet, Michael Sailer, Albrecht Schmidt, Tina Seidel, Matthias Stadler, Jochen Weller, Jochen Kuhn, Gjergjj Kasneci (2023) “ChatGPT for good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education”. Learning and Individual Differences, 103; 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kohnke, Lucas, Benjamin L. Moorhouse, Di Zou (2023) “ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning”. RELC Journal; 00336882231162868. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kostka, Ilka, Rachel Toncelli (2023) “Exploring Applications of ChatGPT to English Language Teaching: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations”. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
Krippendorff, Klaus (2019) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (4th edition.). SAGE Publications.
Kroeze, Jan H., Mathias Mujinga, Mariki M. Eloff (2018) “System Usability Scale Evaluation of Online Banking Services : A South African Study”. South African Journal of Science, 114(3–4); 50–57. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/20170065
Li, Hong (2022) “Robust binary logistic regression methods”. Advances and Applications in Statistics, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361722045
Liu, Guangxiang, Chaojun Ma (2023) “Measuring EFL Learners’ Use of ChatGPT in Informal Digital Learning of English Based on the Technology Acceptance Model”. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
Lo, Chung Kwan (2023) “What is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature”. Education Sciences, 13(4); 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Munawaroh, Siti, Syahdan Syahdan (2021) “Tools to Support Classroom Settings: Perceptions of EFL Students on ICT Usage during Pre-Service Teaching Program”. Utamax (Online), 1(2); 54–64. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i2.6341
Ngo, Thi T. A. (2023) “The Perception by University Students of the Use of ChatGPT in Education”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(17); 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Nyns, Roland R. (1989) “Is Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning Possible?” System, 17(1); 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90058-4
Perkins, Mike (2023) “Academic Integrity Considerations of AI Large Language Models in the Post-pandemic Era: ChatGPT and Beyond”. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2); 07. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rodríguez, José M. R., María S. R. Montoya, Mariana B. Fernández, Fernando L. Lara (2023) “Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students' Perceived Usefulness”. NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2); 323–339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Schmidt-Fajlik, Ronald (2023). “ChatGPT as a Grammar Checker for Japanese English Language Learners: A Comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid”. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(1); 105–119. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.231417
Shackel, Brian (2009). Usability – Context, Framework, Definition, Design and Evaluation. Interacting with Computers, 21(5–6); 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007
Shaikh, Sarang, Sule Y. Yayilgan, Blanka Klimova, Marcel Pikhart (2023) “Assessing the Usability of ChatGPT for Formal English Language Learning”. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(9); 1937–1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13090140
Shoufan, Abdulhadi (2023) “Exploring Students’ Perceptions of CHATGPT: Thematic Analysis and Follow-Up Survey”. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224
Singh, Harpreet, Mohammad H. Tayarani-Najaran, Muhammad Yaqoob (2023) “Exploring Computer Science Students’ Perception of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Descriptive and Correlation Study”. Education Sciences, 13(9) ; 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090924
Su, Yanfang, Yun Lin, Chun Lai (2023) “Collaborating with ChatGPT in Argumentative Writing Classrooms”. Assessing Writing, 57; 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
Sultan Alshraideh, Doniazad (2021) “EFL Learners’ and Teachers’ Perception toward the Use of Online Videos in EFL Classes”. Arab World English Journal, 12(1); 215–228. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.15
Usability (n.d.), Usability.gov website, U.S. Government, accessed 20 November 2023, < https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html/>
Ventayen, Randy J. M., Caren C. Orlanda-Ventayen (2018) “Graduate Students’ Perspective on the Usability of Grammarly® in One ASEAN State University”. Asian ESP Journal, 14(7.2). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3310702
Wolf, James P. (2013). “Exploring and Contrasting EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Textbook-Assigned and Self-selected Discussion Topics”. Language Teaching Research: LTR, 17(1); 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457535
Yan, Da (2023). “Impact of ChatGPT on Learners in a L2 Writing Practicum: An Exploratory Investigation”. Education and Information Technologies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Zirar, Araz (2023). “Exploring the Impact of Language Models, such as ChatGPT, on Student Learning and Assessment”. Review of Education, 11(3); e3433. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3433
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium